RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03180
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 29 Jun 10, be removed from the
Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He failed the FA dated 29 Jun 10, because he was forced to
accomplish another FA two months after passing the previous FA.
He believes the failed FA was due to the mentality and
stubbornness of a naïve airman, which resulted in a referral
enlisted performance report and rendered him ineligible for
promotion testing.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in
the grade of staff sergeant (E-5).
He received an unsatisfactory score on his FA dated 29 Jun 10.
On 27 Jul 12, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting
additional documentation. Specifically, he was asked to provide
a copy of a signed memorandum from the commander; his fitness
score sheet and the fitness questionnaire f
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM notes they queried the
applicant for additional medical information with regard to his
contention he failed the FA because he was forced to complete a
FA when he was not due; however, the applicant failed to respond
to their request for additional information.
The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 29 Oct 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit C).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA
is in error or unjust. In this respect, we note the Air Force
office of primary responsibility (OPR) requested additional
information from the applicant with regard to his contention that
he failed the FA because he was forced to complete it when he
was not due assessment; however, he did not respond. Therefore,
in the absence of substantial evidence supporting his
contentions, we find that he has failed to meet his burden of
proving the contested FA is in error or unjust. . However,
should the applicant provide additional evidence supporting his
contentions, we would be willing to reconsider his request. In
view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-03180 in Executive Session on 19 Mar 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Jul 12, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 16 Oct 12, w/atch.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Oct 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02595
After further review of his fitness history, DPSIM states that he had a passing FA dated 3 Jan 2011, which was in between his failed FAs dated 4 Oct 2010 and 27 Jul 2011. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit B. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Oct 2012.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-02006
His providers memorandum for record (MFR) stated he had a medical condition that prevented him from attaining a passing score on the walking component of his FA; however, the test was not removed from his records. Upon expiration of your 42 days reconditioning, you are cleared to test in all components of the AF Fitness Test. On 29 May 12, a memorandum was sent to applicant requesting additional documentation for removal of his FA dated 29 Oct 10. While he contends that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00540
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00540 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) scores, dated 16 Jun 10, 23 Sep 10, 17 Dec 10, 25 Mar 11, 3 Jul 12, and 1 Oct 12, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant completed 36 sit-ups; however, the passing minimum score for...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01787
The medical documents mentioned above validates the applicant had a medical condition that precluded him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. DPSIM indicates he has not provided documentation from his medical provider stating his medical condition would prevent him from achieving a passing score on the contested FA. In this respect, the applicant failed to provide a letter from his medical provider stating how his medical condition prevented him from passing the AC component...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04179
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial of his request to have his FA dated 20 Jun 12, removed from AFFMS indicating the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence to support his claim. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial of the applicants request to remove the demotion action and restore his rank to SrA. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 13 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03180
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 15 Aug 12 be removed from his records. The applicant contends that he suffered from a medical condition that precluded him from passing the contested FA and, thus, said FA should be removed from his records. While we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03075
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. The applicant did provide a copy of his AF Form 108, dated 7 Jun 12; however, it has no comments on the preexisting conditions. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicants contentions, we are not persuaded the contested FA is in error or unjust.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03220
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03220 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Fitness Assessments (FAs) dated 29 Oct 10, 28 Oct 11, and 16 Nov 12 be declared void and removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The applicant clarifies in his response to the Air Force Evaluation that the FA he is...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-04155
Therefore, they recommend the AC component of the FA dated 31 Jul 2012, be updated to reflect "exempt" in AFFMS. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The facts support his assertion that the entire FA should be removed from his record and that he should be granted the opportunity to re-test immediately. ...